![]() ![]() |
|
February 16, 2023 |
With the traditional ringing of the bell we bring this meeting to order!
Club member's attendance is recorded by logging in.
Visiting Rotarians may complete a makeup form at the end of this meeting; YOUR donation for making up with us helps fund our service projects!
Visitors are always welcome to browse and register without obligation.
Our club offers the flexibility of ROTARY ON YOUR TIME!
and an opportunity to remain connected with Rotary!

Welcome to this week’s meeting of the eClub of the State of Jefferson.
I am Bob Gibson, President of the Rotary eClub of State of Jefferson. Welcome to this week’s meeting. I hope this finds you well.
Your eClub has been busy. Last week we met with John Allman and received an update on our service project with the Navajo Nation. An event is being planned, starting on June 7 in Chinle, Arizona. It will be an opportunity to participate in this great project. If you are interested, please let John Allman or me know. There are limited accommodations and arrangements need to be made.
We had a Coffee Chat on Saturday. It was a wonderfully informal conversation covering a number of topics. It is a great chance to have the kind of relaxed conversations we might have at a traditional Club meeting. The Coffee Chats are going to continue. I will let you know when we schedule to next one.
We also had a meeting about our eClub Foundation. There is a strong consensus that it has real value to our eClub. The eClub Foundation can be used to receive donations for our service projects. We are working to bring the Foundation Board up to full strength. If you would like to serve as a Director on the eClub Foundation please let me know.
Today we have our monthly Board meeting. I invite all members to attend. Your Board provides support and direction in many areas. I truly appreciate the passion and energy they bring to the table.
Thank you for your interest in our Club and your commitment to “Service above Self.”
Enjoy the meeting.
If you have any questions or comments, I am available. My e-mail address is: bob@bluewaterphoto.net.
email president@StateOfJeffersonRotary.org

eClub Board Meeting February 16, 2023
08:00 AM Pacific Time
District Training Assembly March 28, 2023, Cottage Grove
District Conference, May 6-7, 2023
Rotary responds to earthquake in Turkey, Syria
Turkey and Syria were struck by a devastating earthquake on 6 February that has killed tens of thousands of people, destroyed thousands of homes and other structures, and left people across the region without shelter in bitterly cold winter weather. The Rotary world responded to this catastrophe immediately. Rotary leadership has activated our disaster response efforts, communicated with the affected districts, and encouraged governors in those regions to apply for disaster response grants. In addition, our project partner ShelterBox and service partner Habitat for Humanity are working on their responses. Find out how you can have the greatest impact.
ShelterBox is an official partner project with Rotary International designed to help provide immediate emergency assistance before traditional relief organizations can reach disaster areas due to logistic obstacles. ShelterBox accomplishes this with advance-sponsored boxes/kits (such as from our club), which are pre-positioned in regional warehouses around the world, and are then deployed by participating air forces (including the USAF and RAF) and charter companies immediately into a disaster area. These kits are disaster and area-specific, intended for short-term survival with the most basic necessities to support a family unit of up to ten with approximately ten days of food, water, shelter, heating, tools - until the traditional disaster relief organizations can reach the affected area.
Our club initially took this on as a worthwhile international project; to date we have sponsored five boxes and one kit. All but one of the five boxes we sponsored have been deployed to assist in disaster areas around the world:
2012 Niger - floods
2012 Lebanon - Syrian refugee crisis
2015 Nepal - earthquake
2016 Syria - civil war
2017 Puerto Rico - Hurricane Irma
We have $30.00 towards another Shelter Box (cost is $1,000). Will you help us reach this goal?

February is Peace and Conflict Prevention / Resolution Month

Today, over 70 million people are displaced as a result of conflict, violence, persecution, and human rights violations. Half of them are children.
We refuse to accept conflict as a way of life. Rotary projects provide training that fosters understanding and provides communities with the skills to resolve conflicts.
Peace is a cornerstone of Rotary’s mission. By carrying out service projects in this area of focus and supporting Rotary Peace Fellowships and scholarships, you become part of Rotary’s effort to address the underlying causes of conflict, such as poverty, discrimination, ethnic tension, lack of access to education, and unequal distribution of resources. During Peace building and Conflict Prevention Month in February, review Rotary’s brochure about our peace efforts and find ways to get involved in building more stable, peaceful communities.
Rotary creates environments of peace
As a humanitarian organization, peace is a cornerstone of our mission. We believe when people work to create peace in their communities, that change can have a global effect.
By carrying out service projects and supporting peace fellowships and scholarships, our members take action to address the underlying causes of conflict, including poverty, discrimination, ethnic tension, lack of access to education, and unequal distribution of resources.
Our commitment to peacebuilding today answers new challenges: how we can make the greatest possible impact and how we can achieve our vision of lasting change. We are approaching the concept of peace with greater cohesion and inclusivity, broadening the scope of what we mean by peacebuilding, and finding more ways for people to get involved.
Rotary creates environments where peace can happen.
Rotary’s Four Roles in Promoting Peace
Rotary and its members are:
- Practitioners: Our work fighting disease, providing clean water and sanitation, improving the health of mothers and children, supporting education, and growing local economies directly builds the optimal conditions for peaceful societies.
- Educators: Our Rotary Peace Centers have trained over 1,300 peace fellows to become effective catalysts for peace through careers in government, education, and international organizations.
- Mediators: Our members have negotiated humanitarian ceasefires in areas of conflict to allow polio vaccinators to reach children who are at risk.
- Advocates: Our members have an integral role as respected, impartial participants during peace processes and in post-conflict reconstruction. We focus on creating communities and convening groups that are connected, inclusive, and resilient.
Creating peace clubs in Nigerian schools

By Eyerusalem Azmeraw, Project Officer, UNESCO IICBA, and Pietro Uzochukwu Macleo, Chair of the Rotary Nigeria National Peacebuilding and Conflict Prevention Committee and Peace Chair for the Great Britain and Ireland – Nigeria Rotary Intercountry Committee
In February 2022, we joined together with other colleagues to organize a workshop in Nigeria on preventing violent extremism among young people. Conflict and violence have long been prevalent in the country, with youth recognized as having a role in preventing extremism. Our aim was to address violent extremism and its underlying causes among youth by strengthening the ability of teachers to deal with these issues.
Through a train-the-trainers model, we empowered learners to critically examine their beliefs, values, and knowledge in order to develop critical thinking. We relied on transformative pedagogy, a holistic educational approach that engages learners as whole persons in collaborative and participatory activities for peacebuilding. The approach creates a sense of interdependence and interconnectedness among people who are learning to live together.
About 500 participants attended, with 110 passing the optional exam at the end of the training and thereby qualifying as Positive Peace Ambassadors. Rotary, UNESCO’s International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa (IICBA), the African Union Youth for Peace Programme (AU Y4P), Arigatou International, and the Institute for Economics and Peace collaborated on the training with funding from the Government of Japan.
The first week focused on the key components of Positive Peace and current conditions in Nigeria, an ethnically, religiously, and culturally diverse country with some 500 languages. Protracted violent conflicts and insecurity are one of the most pressing and critical issues across the country, as set out in the Global Peace Index and Positive Peace reports. Participants in the training deepened their understanding of the Institute for Economics and Peace’s eight pillars of Positive Peace.
The second week focused on the role of education in peace- and resilience-building as well as on the prevention of violent extremism. Participants discussed the role of education and proposed ways to facilitate genuine participatory and collaborative learning while increasing the level of engagement from community stakeholders – especially youth. We used the youth guide on peacebuilding and preventing violence in Africa developed by UNESCO IICBA, which is also available in Arabic and French.
The training in Nigeria was part of a multi-country initiative managed by UNESCO IICBA, but the Nigeria component also emerged from previous work by the Rotary Nigeria Peace Commission. The Commission consists of national, zone, and state coordinators across every state in Nigeria along with more than 5,000 volunteers across the country. It promotes Activating Positive Peace in Nigeria through social change interventions.
An independent evaluation suggests that the multi-country program has been successful. Participants in Nigeria were enthusiastic as well. Here is what one participant said:
“The training was a major departure from the tradition training model. It was context-specific, with clearly outlined steps leading to tangible results. Upon completion, I found that I could apply most of what I learned in virtually all areas of human endeavor. I immediately engaged the Blade Martial Arts Taekwondo Academy within my sphere of influence, and the feedback from parents and students have been nothing but rewarding.” ~ Bama Francis Uchechukwu
What’s next for Nigeria? We’re currently talking with the Federal Ministry of Education of Nigeria on the possibility of establishing Peace Clubs in primary, secondary and tertiary educational institutions nationwide. If the Federal Ministry grants its authorization for this initiative, funding will be needed to expand the program.
We are organizing a webinar on 13 February to share lessons learned from this project in Nigeria and elsewhere. If you would like to participate, please register here. We are also considering putting together a proposal for a global grant that could receive matching funds from The Rotary Foundation. If your Rotary club or district might be interested, please contact us at pietrouzo@gmail.com and a.eyerusalem@unesco.org. And if you would like us to make a presentation about this initiative to your club or district, let us know!
![]()
Choosing the Right Path toward Polio Eradication
List of authors.
- Konstantin Chumakov, Ph.D., D.Sci.,
- Christian Brechot, M.D., Ph.D.,
- Robert C. Gallo, M.D.,
- and Stanley Plotkin, M.D.
The recent declaration of a public health emergency in New York State after a case of paralytic poliomyelitis caused by a circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV), along with cVDPV detection in wastewater both in New York and in London, is a sobering reminder that polio still represents a threat even in countries that have not seen it for decades.1 Silent circulation of poliovirus was not unexpected: such circulation was previously observed in countries using inactivated polio vaccine (IPV). Unlike oral polio vaccine (OPV), IPV does not induce the robust mucosal immunity that is important for preventing circulation. The continued circulation of wild and attenuated polioviruses suggests that the approach used by the polio-eradication campaign needs reevaluation.
The Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI), launched 34 years ago, aimed to eradicate poliomyelitis by 2000.2 The chosen strategy was to stop circulation of wild polioviruses, following the successful example of smallpox eradication. The task, however, turned out to be much more challenging than eradicating smallpox had been, since there are hundreds of asymptomatic poliovirus infections for each paralytic case that occurs, which substantially complicates critical surveillance. Aside from challenges inherent in vaccine delivery in some countries, another reason for the failure to eradicate polio were outbreaks caused by cVDPV strains that emerged from viruses used in OPV.3 Thus, to actually eradicate poliovirus, the use of OPV must also be stopped.
The conundrum was how to withdraw OPV that was essential to eradication efforts without jeopardizing their success. Stopping all immunizations after the disease is eradicated, as was done with smallpox, is a nonstarter because it’s impossible to ensure that no live virus remains loose anywhere in the world, and polio can easily be synthesized in laboratories. The absence of virus circulation and paralytic cases cannot be sustained without universal and comprehensive population immunity. The lack of immunity would result in global vulnerability, and reintroduction of the virus could start a pandemic with potentially catastrophic consequences. A preview of this scenario was provided by the 2016 switch from trivalent to bivalent OPV that omitted the serotype 2 OPV (OPV2) component4; this move created immunity gaps that led to the dramatic proliferation of mutated type 2 viruses. In contrast to what modeling had predicted, the targeted use of monovalent OPV2 to control outbreaks only seeded additional ones, creating a Catch-22.
Fortunately, the visionary thinking of some scientists as well as public health experts at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organization (WHO) resulted in concerted efforts to develop a more genetically stable strain of vaccine poliovirus. The resulting novel OPV2 was introduced for outbreak control in 2020 and was found to be more stable than the original serotype 2 Sabin strain.5 More than 500 million doses have been distributed, and the vaccine has seeded no cVDPV outbreaks. Similar genetically stable strains of serotypes 1 and 3 were created and are undergoing clinical evaluation.
This important development fostered hope that cVDPV outbreaks that occur primarily in Africa and south central Asia might soon be controlled. But the New York case and the discovery of the silent circulation of poliovirus in high-income countries that use IPV demand reassessment of our approach to polio eradication. Although IPV provides excellent protection against paralytic disease, it does not prevent silent circulation of the virus that can eventually infect unimmunized and immunocompromised people. We need to develop new long-term immunization policies that will not only protect vaccinees from paralytic disease but also minimize silent circulation of polioviruses.
The current plan is to withdraw bivalent OPV within 3 years after the circulation of wild type 1 poliovirus is stopped, and then continue immunizations with IPV only. Unlike the 2016 switch from trivalent to bivalent vaccine, the decision to withdraw OPV should be made not on the basis of the perceived absence of poliovirus circulation, but rather on the basis of availability of ample supply of IPV and the readiness of vaccine-delivery infrastructure.
According to the recommendation of the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization, the IPV-only phase should continue for 10 years after the withdrawal of OPV, at which time the question of whether polio immunization may become optional can be discussed. This plan may be the biggest flaw in the current strategy, because it is imperative to maintain the highest possible population immunity level indefinitely. Putting off the decision until the distant future sends a number of wrong messages.
First, setting a time horizon for the elimination of polio vaccines discourages manufacturers from investing in research and development of better vaccines. There are several options for such vaccines. Genetically stable novel OPV might be the best solution for countries with high poliovirus transmission. Inexpensive and easy to deliver, it would create comprehensive immunity that would protect people from paralysis and minimize virus circulation without triggering cVDPV outbreaks. Highly effective combination vaccines such as hexavalent vaccines containing IPV along with diphtheria–tetanus–pertussis, Hemophilus influenzae type b, and hepatitis B antigens could be most useful for high- and middle-income countries. In addition, there are several innovative polio vaccines in development — for example, some based on virus-like particles, mucosal vectored vaccines, and RNA vaccines. But unless a clear signal is sent to vaccine manufacturers, these innovative products will never reach the market.
Second, cessation of polio vaccination sends a wrong signal to the general public that vaccination against polio is not needed if there is no detected virus circulation, thereby contributing to vaccine hesitancy and immunity gaps.
There are serious scientific questions that must be addressed if we are to formulate future immunization policies tailored to different parts of the world. High-income countries will most likely continue using IPV-containing combination vaccines, but is there also a role for novel OPV to close the gaps in mucosal immunity and stop silent virus circulation? What is the best policy for middle- and low-income countries, and how can a sustainable scheme for supporting the vaccination programs in resource-limited countries be created?
All these policy decisions must be based on solid science. In the past, the GPEI’s strategic thinking was guided by a scientific advisory committee, but that committee was disbanded years ago, in part because of the perception that science was no longer needed because eradication was just around the corner. This wishful thinking has prevailed for the past 30 years and has proven counterproductive.
The original 1988 World Health Assembly declaration called for eradication of poliomyelitis, emphasizing that “eradication efforts should be pursued in ways which strengthen the development of the Expanded Programme on Immunization as a whole, fostering its contribution, in turn, to the development of the health infrastructure and of primary health care.”2 We believe the GPEI should revert to the declaration’s original intent of eradicating the disease by creating universal immunity to polio rather than continue pursuing viral eradication that has been unsuccessful. It is important to engage the entire scientific and public health communities in developing a rational and sustainable future polio-immunization strategy. We urge the WHO and all their partners, including Rotary International and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, to initiate an open dialogue with scientists about the strategy for preventing polio.

Save the Date! June 7th, 2023 to participate in Navajo Solar light installations.
Housing is limited. Contact John Allman to reserve your space and to get more information.


![]()
Who Was Yasuke, Japan’s First Black Samurai?
In the late 16th century, the enigmatic warrior fought alongside a feudal lord dubbed the “Great Unifier”

Seconds into the first episode of the Netflix anime “Yasuke,” viewers witness a massacre. Hundreds of warriors lie dead near the Honnoji Temple in Kyoto, Japan. The year is 1582, and flames envelop the area surrounding the fallen.
Inside the temple, a Black samurai named Yasuke has a tense conversation with the Japanese daimyo (warlord) Oda Nobunaga. While Nobunaga is resigned to his fate, Yasuke remains hopeful the pair can evade their enemies and live to fight another day. “All that is left for me is an honorable death,” Nobunaga tells Yasuke. The daimyo pierces a sword through his own abdomen before asking Yasuke what he’s waiting for. Letting out a loud scream, the samurai lifts his sword to decapitate Nobunaga, completing the warlord’s ritual suicide, or seppuku.

Though the Netflix series introduces several mystical elements—including giant flying robots, magical armies and weaponized laser beams—the broad strokes of its depiction of the Honnoji Incident are historically accurate. Yasuke was an African warrior in the employ of Nobunaga, a powerful feudal lord known as the “Great Unifier,” during Japan’s Sengoku period. The first Black samurai, he was at Nobunaga’s side when the daimyo died; according to popular lore, Nobunaga tasked Yasuke with returning his head to his son.
Beyond his relationship with the famous warlord, Yasuke was a barrier-breaking figure in his own right. Though his life is poorly documented, his story speaks to the surprising cultural connections that existed in 16th-century Japan.
“Yasuke crossed geographic, cultural and linguistic barriers to create—whether by necessity or design—a new life in a foreign land,” says Natalia Doan, a historian at the University of Oxford.
Who was Yasuke?
Not much is known about Yasuke’s early life. Some historians speculate he was born in Mozambique, Ethiopia or Nigeria. Thomas Lockley, co-author of African Samurai: The True Story of Yasuke, a Legendary Black Warrior in Feudal Japan, says it’s possible Yasuke was enslaved and trafficked as a child but believes he was a free man by the time he met Alessandro Valignano, an Italian Jesuit missionary. The duo traveled from India to Japan in 1579, with Yasuke essentially serving as Valignano’s bodyguard.
Yasuke “was employed as muscle because missionaries aren’t allowed to have weapons,” Lockley says. “Japan at the time was in the middle of a brutal century of civil war, and therefore [Valignano] needed somebody to look after him.”

The civil war in question began in 1467 with the collapse of the Ashikaga shogunate, which left rival feudal lords vying for control of Japan. These clashes continued through the mid-1500s, when Nobunaga consolidated power by unifying half of the island nation under his ruthless regime.
Yasuke first crossed paths with Nobunaga in 1581, when Valignano requested permission from the warlord to leave the country—a customary practice in an era before passports, according to Lockley. Nobunaga was fascinated by the color of Yasuke’s skin, which he initially believed to be covered in black paint. As Lockley explains, the daimyo ordered Yasuke to be washed, but his skin color remained unchanged. Nobunaga threw a welcome party for his visitor, who officially entered his service soon after.
The Chronicle of Lord Nobunaga, a 17th-century book written by one of Nobunaga’s followers, describes Yasuke as “[appearing] to be 26 or 27 years old. … This man looked robust and had a good demeanor. What is more, his formidable strength surpassed that of ten men.” Other chronicles characterize the samurai as an intelligent, imposing figure who stood more than six feet tall. Though Yasuke was already a skilled warrior, he likely underwent additional martial arts training upon joining Nobunaga’s army.

In 16th-century Japan, the title of samurai spoke to rank and was loosely defined as a warrior in the service of a lord or another warrior. By 1581, Nobunaga employed thousands of samurai—yet Yasuke was the first foreign-born warrior to enter their ranks. He belonged to “the very small entourage around Nobunaga, which [was] probably around 30 to 50 [warriors], mainly young men, many of [whom were Nobunaga’s] lovers as well,” Lockley says. Traditionally, older warriors like Nobunaga, then in his early 50s, mentored younger warriors and developed sexual relationships with them. No evidence indicates that Yasuke and Nobunaga were lovers.
Though Yasuke was the only Black samurai in Nobunaga’s army, he was by no means the only African present in Japan at the time. “Several hundred African people lived in Japan during the 16th century,” says Doan. “[They] worked as interpreters, soldiers, entertainers” and more. She says that Kyoto’s Japanese residents would have been surprised by Yasuke’s “foreignness” but likely wouldn’t have exhibited prejudice based on his skin color. According to Lockley, Nobunaga was a powerful man whom few were willing to challenge, so his decision to employ Yasuke wasn’t controversial. In fact, the samurai proved to be quite popular among locals, who flocked to catch a glimpse of him.
Yasuke’s final stand
Yasuke joined Nobunaga during the last months of the feudal lord’s unification campaign. “His strategy was to impose peace by force of arms,” Lockley says. “He would quite happily wipe out 10,000 people if he thought it would forward the aims of peace.” Though Nobunaga was close to completing his goal of consolidating control of Japan, his efforts came to an abrupt close after one of his trusted generals, Akechi Mitsuhide, betrayed him.

On June 21, 1582, Mitsuhide ambushed Nobunaga in Kyoto while they were en route to a battle. Mitsuhide had thousands of troops under his command; Nobunaga was accompanied by just 30 or so men from his inner circle, including Yasuke. “[Mitsuhide] brings 13,000 troops into Kyoto [and] surrounds the temple where [Nobunaga is] staying,” says Lockley. “[It’s] a foregone conclusion. It’s 13,000 against 30.”
Mitsuhide’s men slaughtered many of the soldiers in Nobunaga’s entourage during the initial ambush. Eventually, Nobunaga, Yasuke and an attendant named Mori Ranmaru—the feudal lord’s lover at the time—retreated to one of the temple’s chambers. It was here that Nobunaga performed seppuku, using a sword to slice open his abdomen before Ranmaru beheaded him. Ranmaru then also performed seppuku, asking Yasuke, in turn, to decapitate him.
“If you’re going to die anyway, you might as well die quicker, by your own hand, and retain some honor,” says Lockley. Once both Nobunaga and Ranmaru were dead, Yasuke escaped from the temple with his lord’s head in tow. By protecting Nobunaga’s remains, Yasuke denied Mitsuhide the chance to seize his enemy’s head and display it as a way of establishing legitimacy and power.
“The reason behind Mitsuhide’s betrayal of Nobunaga is one of the great mysteries of Japanese history,” Doan says. “There are many stories—not all of them historically verifiable—of what could have led to the Honnoji Incident.”

Not much is known about Yasuke’s fate after the ambush. According to Lockley, he may have been badly wounded and captured as one of the last survivors of Nobunaga’s inner circle. The last known record of Yasuke describes him being escorted to a Jesuit mission by Mitsuhide’s warriors. “What we do know,” says Doan, “is that Mitsuhide did not execute Yasuke.”
Lockley speculates that Mitsuhide spared Yasuke to gain the support of the Jesuit missionaries. The usurping general lacked allies and only survived Nobunaga by a few days. On July 2, one of Nobunaga’s retainers, Toyotomi Hideyoshi, defeated Mitsuhide at the Battle of Yamazaki. Hideyoshi went on to become Japan’s second “Great Unifier,” uniting the entire country by 1590.
Yasuke in pop culture
Despite the lack of concrete information about Yasuke, the samurai’s life has inspired a range of adaptations. In 1968, Japanese author Kurusu Yoshio published Kuro-suke, a children’s book that dramatizes Yasuke’s story. More recent titles about the warrior include Lockley’s 2019 book, co-written with Geoffrey Girard, and Jamal Turner’s 2020 children’s book Yasuke: The Legend of the African Samurai. Yasuke also shows up in the 2017 video game “Nioh,” which is set during the Sengoku period.

In 2019, Chadwick Boseman, perhaps best known for portraying the eponymous superhero in Marvel’s Black Panther, signed on to play Yasuke in an upcoming film. “The legend of Yasuke is one of history’s best kept secrets, the only person of non-Asian origin to become a samurai,” the actor told Deadline. “That’s not just an action movie, that’s a cultural event, an exchange, and I am excited to be part of it.” Boseman died of colon cancer in August 2020, leaving the project’s future uncertain.
Production on the live-action film may be stalled, but that hasn’t stopped other creatives from offering their own takes on Yasuke. The six-episode anime “Yasuke,” released on Netflix in April 2021, follows a heavily fictionalized version of the warrior 20 years after the Honnoji Incident as he battles giant robots, ancient demons and other evil creatures. LaKeith Stanfield of Judas and the Black Messiah fame voices Yasuke, who spends the series protecting Saki, a young girl with magical powers, from dark forces as they journey north together.
“Since Yasuke doesn’t have an owned estate, no one owns his character—his story was up for interpretation,” animation director LeSean Thomas told Den of Geek last year. “I knew I wanted to tell a story that was removed from history so that we can create a new action hero and celebrate him through this adventure story.”
Yoshiko Okuyama, an expert on Japanese studies at the University of Hawaiʻi at Hilo, praises “Yasuke” for featuring a Black hero as its lead character. Referencing the lack of racial diversity in anime, the scholar points out that portrayals of Black people in early animated titles were often demeaning, showing these individuals with exaggerated facial features.
“Although [‘Yasuke’] is a fantasy, the story is drawn from a documented history about a real-life dark-skinned samurai in 16th-century Japan, which not so many Japanese themselves knew,” Okuyama says. “In the past, Japan’s anime, as well as American animation works, grossly misrepresented [Black characters] for decades. It is overdue that they are put in central roles with positive traits, as movers and shakers of the story, not as sidekicks or villains.”
Doan, meanwhile, notes that Yasuke’s voice is conspicuously absent from adaptations of his life. No documents produced by the samurai himself are known to survive today. But, she says, “Even without a large number of surviving historical sources for us to understand the full extent of Yasuke’s activity or personal experiences, Yasuke’s story is an example of the kind of exciting and unexpected transnational encounters occurring within Black and Japanese history.”
weekly@StateOfJeffersonRotary.org
![]()
Essentially, everyone in the country is at risk for infection now, even if they're super careful, up to date on vaccines, or have caught it before, said Paula Cannon, a virologist at the University of Southern California.
"It's crazy infectious," said Cannon, who is recovering from her first case of COVID-19, caught when she was vacationing over the holidays in her native Britain.
Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.
"All the things that have protected you for the past couple of years, I don't think are going to protect you against this new crop of variants," she said.
The number of severe infections and deaths remains relatively low, despite the high level of infections, she said, thanks to vaccinations – and probably – previous infections. But the lack of universal masking means that even people like her, who do wear masks, are vulnerable.
The latest variant, called XBB.1.5, grew exponentially over the month of December, from about 1% of cases nationwide to 27% as of Jan. 7, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The variant is likely behind the vast majority of cases in New York and New England.
Its growth is probably due to XBB.1.5's characteristics – it appears to bind even more tightly to receptors in the human body than its predecessors – as well as human behavior, such as traveling and not masking.
It's a good idea to do what you can to avoid getting infected, said Dr. Ziyad Al-Aly, chief of research and development at the VA St. Louis Health Care System and a clinical epidemiologist at Washington University in St. Louis.
It's still early and there are a lot of unknowns about XBB.1.5, he said. Every infection makes someone vulnerable to a bad course of the disease and to the lingering, miserable symptoms of long COVID, Al-Aly's research shows.
"Reinfection buys you additional risk," he said.
As the United States enters the fourth year of COVID-19, we're providing an update on the state of the pandemic. Here's a preview of what you'll learn in this article:
- COVID symptoms and XBB.1.5
- How long does COVID last?
- Can you get COVID more than once?
- How to avoid infection
- What to do if you get sick
- Why it's better not to get infected
- Could we be nearing the end of COVID?
What to know about XBB.1.5 symptoms and how long they last
COVID-19 symptoms typically last around five to seven days and can include fever, sore throat, muscle aches, exhaustion, nausea, cough and sinus congestion, among other problems.
Symptoms with XBB.1.5 are the same as with earlier variants and can range from almost nothing to shortness of breath and low oxygen levels that require emergency medical attention.
Early in the pandemic, COVID-19 often cost people their sense of taste and smell, at least temporarily, but that symptom seems less common, possibly because of vaccination or previous infection rather than a change in the virus, said Dr. Peter Hotez, an infectious disease specialist and co-director of the Center for Vaccine Development at Texas Children’s Hospital.
How long does COVID last? How long are you contagious?
It takes anywhere from two to 14 days for exposure to lead to symptoms and a positive test.
People with COVID-19 are contagious as long as they remain positive on a rapid test, typically for about 10 days, but often longer.
The CDC recommends people isolate for at least five days and wear an N95 or similarly protective mask for at least 10 days when around others. Day One is considered the first full day after symptoms start.
A PCR test, which is considered the gold standard for diagnosing COVID-19, can remain positive for months because it detects viral fragments as well as the whole, infectious virus. To confirm the end of the contagious period, experts instead recommend a negative rapid test after 10 days or two within 48 hours if sooner.
Can you get COVID more than once?
Yes. While a previous infection provides some protection, that fades over time and as the virus evolves into different variants.
Some people who had a mild case with a first infection get hit harder the second or third time, while others might suffer less.
"Even if you've had it before, that doesn't mean your next bout is going to be the same," Cannon said. There are lots of factors at play in determining the seriousness of an infection, she said, including prior immunity, the nature of the variant and how long it's been since your last infection or vaccination.
It's possible that her recent infection was much milder than her husband's, for instance, because she had caught a head cold a few days earlier, while her husband hadn't. A respiratory virus can put the immune system on high alert and might have provided some protection when she was exposed to COVID-19.
"It's part of the bigger dance between our bodies and our immune system," Cannon said.
How to avoid infection
The methods for avoiding infection haven't changed, though it can be hard to stick with them when no one else is: Get vaccinated, wear a mask and avoid crowded spaces.
First is getting vaccinated. This will protect against severe infection as well as reduce the risk of passing the virus to others, said Hotez, also dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine.
The newer boosters, which take aim at both the original virus and the BA.4/BA.5 variants common this summer, are more protective against XBB.1.5 than earlier boosters. People who are up to date on their COVID-19 shots probably don't shed as much virus for as long, so they're also less likely to pass it on, he added.
Past infection provides some protection against severe disease, but that protection is "highly unreliable," Hotez said.
Second is wearing a mask. Good quality, well-fitting masks, like an N95 or KN95 can reduce the risk of infection.
Cannon said people sometimes get annoyed at her mask-wearing "because it's like I'm reminding them that (COVID) is still a problem." But she doesn't want to accidentally pass COVID on to someone who might be more vulnerable to the virus.
Third is avoiding crowded indoor spaces. You're less likely to get infected in large indoor spaces with high ceilings and lots of ventilation than in cramped, airless ones.
What to do if you get sick
It's a good idea to have a plan ready in case you get sick, Cannon said. She suggests every plan include:
- How to isolate from others in your household
- The contact number for a health care provider who can prescribe an antiviral
- Equipment such as rapid coronavirus tests, extra masks, a thermometer and a pulse oximeter to make sure the patient's blood oxygen level doesn't drop below the low 90s
Every U.S. household is eligible for four free coronavirus tests from the government that can be ordered from this link: covid.gov/tests.
For someone over 60 or with medical conditions like obesity that raise the risk for serious disease, the first step after a positive test should be a call to the doctor to get the antiviral Paxlovid, she and others said. The government has pre-bought millions of doses, so they are available for free.
Some doctors are hesitant to provide the antiviral because people may need to stop taking common medications during the five-day treatment course, but it's essential for people at high risk for serious disease, Hotez said. "Any senior going on Paxlovid is not dying," he said.
"We can't stop people getting infected," Cannon added, "but we absolutely can stop people from being seriously ill. Gosh, why wouldn't you take it?"
Why it's better not to get infected
Every COVID-19 infection increases your risk for serious disease and for long COVID, which brings sometimes debilitating symptoms that can linger for a year or more.
Older adults are more vulnerable, Al-Aly said, "but it doesn't mean younger people are totally shielded." Long COVID, too, can strike people at any age from childhood through to the 101-year-old recently treated at his hospital, he said.
Vaccination reduces the risk of long COVID by 15% to 30%, according to a study he recently published. Another study he is working on shows Paxlovid reduces the risk by 26%.
Cannon's daughter works in a long COVID clinic and regularly sees patients who are in their 20s or 30s, "healthy people who didn't even have a particularly bad bout of COVID who now have a massively debilitating set of symptoms."
All six experts interviewed by USA TODAY this week dismissed the idea that there is somehow an upside to getting infected: Vaccination provides better protection against future infection without the risk.
"I'd be happy if I never got any virus again," Cannon said. "And I say this as a professional virologist."
Could we be nearing the end of COVID?
COVID-19 has been perhaps the most successful virus in all of human history, Cannon said, infecting billions of people across the planet.
While she worries about how it might continue to evolve, she hopes it's a good sign that for the last year, all the variants have been descendants of omicron.
Before that, the original virus, alpha, beta and delta had been "radically" different from each other.
"The virus is now in this committed lineage," Cannon said, which might mean it won't evolve away from the protection against serious disease that nearly everyone now has from vaccinations and previous infections.
Contact Karen Weintraub at kweintraub@usatoday.com.
Health and patient safety coverage at USA TODAY is made possible in part by a grant from the Masimo Foundation for Ethics, Innovation and Competition in Healthcare. The Masimo Foundation does not provide editorial input.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: People who haven't had COVID will likely catch XBB.1.5 – and many will get reinfected, experts say



You are not authorised to post comments.