![]() ![]() |
|
March 2, 2023 |
With the traditional ringing of the bell we bring this meeting to order!
Club member's attendance is recorded by logging in.
Visiting Rotarians may complete a makeup form at the end of this meeting; YOUR donation for making up with us helps fund our service projects!
Visitors are always welcome to browse and register without obligation.
Our club offers the flexibility of ROTARY ON YOUR TIME!
and an opportunity to remain connected with Rotary!

Welcome to this week’s meeting of the eClub of the State of Jefferson.
I am Bob Gibson, President of the Rotary eClub of State of Jefferson. Welcome to this week’s meeting. I hope this finds you well.
One of the signature programs Rotary offers to young people is the Rotary Youth Leadership Award (RYLA). The Clubs in District 5110 will a leadership camp for 144 high school sophomores and juniors June 20 -25. Our Club didn’t send a student last year. So, we have credit for one tuition fee, $600, with the District. I have seen the impact RYLA can have on a young person. They receive training in leadership, public speaking, and group interaction. They come away with increased self-confidence and the ability to be effective in group settings. It would be wonderful if we could provide this opportunity for a student from one of our communities within our District.
I have contacted the Rotary Club of Lincoln City. If they have more applications than they can send, I asked them to provide me with the contact information. Please contact the Rotary Clubs in your communities with the same request. It would be great if we had students to interview by the end of March. We can set up a Zoom interview and select the best candidate. Here is a link to our District website for more information:
Thank you for your interest in our Club and your commitment to “Service above Self.”
Enjoy the meeting.
If you have any questions or comments, I am available. My e-mail address is: bob@bluewaterphoto.net.
email president@StateOfJeffersonRotary.org

Global Peace Conference March 4, 2023 online
See details in the Rotary Moment
March 8th Celebrating International Women’s Day
International Women’s Day is 8 March, a time to honor the achievements of women around the world and raise awareness of the work that’s still needed to achieve equity. Join Rotary in celebrating International Women’s Day 2023! Our virtual, multi-day observance seeks to raise awareness about the barriers that women around the world face as professional and local leaders and to build a supportive community to take collective action for change. The events, presented in English, are open to Rotary members and nonmembers of all genders. The first event, on 8 March, is a Facebook Live session with Rotary President Jennifer Jones, Vice President Nicki Scott, and guests. Find out more about this free, informative virtual event.
Sunday, March 12, daylight saving time begins.
Move your clocks forward one hour at 2 a.m., and lose an hour of sleep.
District Training Assembly March 28, 2023, Cottage Grove
This in-person meeting will be held at the Phoenix High School, 745 N Rose St, Phoenix, Oregon.
We will begin at 9 am. Lunch is provided at noon. Please Register NOW for Fourth Quarterly Grants Meeting so we may get a head count for food (it’s free).
District Conference, May 6-7, 2023
March is Water and Sanitation Month

Clean water, sanitation, and hygiene education are basic necessities for a healthy environment and a productive life.
When people have access to clean water and sanitation, waterborne diseases decrease, children stay healthier and attend school more regularly, and mothers can spend less time carrying water and more time helping their families.
How Rotary makes help happen
Through water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) programs, Rotary’s people of action mobilize resources, form partnerships, and invest in infrastructure and training that yield long-term change.
The Rotary Foundation is changing the world by providing grants for projects and activities around the globe and in your own backyard:
WASH Global Grant Projects: Since 2013, The Rotary Foundation has invested in more than $130 million in over 2000 projects worldwide. Through this investment, our volunteers of action have improved access to safely managed and basic WASH services to communities, schools and healthcare facilities, while protecting and conserving water resources.
Rotary-USAID WASH Partnership: Rotary and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) assist communities and governments to plan, finance and deliver safe water, sanitation and hygiene services, while sustainably managing water resources.
WASH in Schools Target Challenge: Rotary challenges our members to develop sustainable projects that comprehensively address the most pressing water, sanitation, hygiene and education needs in Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, India, and Kenya.
Register now for the Third Global Peace Conference!
Submitted by eClub Rotarian Carol Fellows
Do you care deeply about your community and are looking for ideas to bring about positive change?
Join us on 4 March 2023 for the third 24-hour online Global Peace Conference: an exciting, interactive convergence of thought-provokers, peacebuilders and everyday people building peace in their spheres of influence.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL AGENDA
The theme of this year’s conference is “Strengthening Our Peacebuilding Community”. This theme is an extension of our desire to connect our planet with people power, towards a peaceful and just existence for all. This year’s 24-hour conference has programming in four global geographical regions, with plenaries and skill-building sessions, covering all time zones across the globe and enabling anyone, anywhere, to participate.
This volunteer-led initiative of Rotary Peace Fellows and other members of the broader Rotary peace ecosystem is based on the premise that everyone has the power to change the world. We work in civil society, academia, and government. We work in conflict resolution, sustainable development, and business. We are change makers in our community wherever we are based across the globe, and have a passion to transform conflict into growth and potential.
This 24-hour Global Peace Conference is not a typical academic conference or business networking opportunity. Our value is in dialogue and in collaboration, so everyone—YOU included—has a part to play in making our conference meaningful.
The event will feature:
- Local peacebuilders from all over the world
- Interactive sessions at all time zones
- Ample opportunity for training and networking
Join us by registering above!
The conference is free of charge thanks to the generosity of volunteers and donors from the Rotary peace community, including Carol Fellows and Tim Bewley.
Got Questions? Questions about Global Peace Conference
Sincerely,
Global Peace Conference Co-Chairs:
Priyanka Borpujari
Frances Jeffries
Florence Maher
RPFAA Board:
Rukmini Iyer
Derran Moss
George Ngwane
![]()
For polio eradication efforts, 2022 brought good news.
Fewer genetic strains of the virus are circulating than ever before. Afghanistan and Pakistan are the only two countries where polio remains endemic. And support from political, medical, and community leaders in those areas has strengthened vaccination efforts during the past year. Global support for polio eradication also reached new heights, as was proven at the World Health Summit in October, when Rotary and international partners and donors pledged a combined US$2.6 billion to eradicate the disease.
There were challenges in 2022 as well. The poliovirus appeared in places it hasn’t been for a long time: Israel, the United Kingdom, and the United States, to name a few. Wild poliovirus cases were reported in Mozambique, related to the 2021 case in Malawi caused by wild poliovirus imported from Pakistan. News of these cases didn’t slow our eradication efforts, however. If anything, it made us even more determined. Now is our best chance to finish the fight against polio.
In 2023, we need everyone’s help. We invite you to use the call to action “Together, we end polio” to express our collective will to finish the job. Explore the shareable images, ads, and other materials on Rotary’s Brand Center, and check again throughout the year, because we’ll add even more content. Let’s work together to end this disease forever.

Save the Date! June 7th, 2023 to participate in Navajo Solar light installations.
Housing is limited. Contact John Allman to reserve your space and to get more information.


![]()
A Century Ago, This Water Agreement Changed the West. Now, the Region Is in Crisis
Much has changed since the Colorado River Compact was signed in 1922

The Colorado River has long been regarded as the “lifeline of the Southwest.” It supplies water to 40 million people in seven states, 29 Native American tribes and parts of Mexico. Farmers use it to irrigate nearly 5.5 million acres of agricultural land.
One hundred years ago this month, the signing of the Colorado River Compact laid the foundation for how water from the river is used today. But the signers of the 1922 agreement had no way of knowing what the future would bring. Decades of overuse because of faulty science and population growth—along with climate change—have all reduced the river’s flow and the water levels in the nation’s largest reservoirs, Lake Mead and Lake Powell. Now, the basin is facing a crisis.
“The conditions that we’re experiencing now are far worse than anyone anticipated them to ever be,” Crystal Tulley-Cordova, principal hydrologist at the Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources, tells Smithsonian magazine.
So, how did the situation evolve into what it is today? And what comes next for the basin? Here are five things you should know about the 1922 agreement for its 100th anniversary.
Where is the Colorado River?
The 1,450-mile-long river begins in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado. It passes through Lake Powell, the Grand Canyon and Lake Mead before ending in Mexico’s Sonoran Desert. Altogether, its drainage basin spans about 246,000 square miles, representing 8 percent of the land in the continental United States.
While the river historically stretched all the way to the Gulf of California, damming and overuse have prevented the water from regularly flowing into the gulf since the 1960s.
What is the Colorado River Compact?
In the early 1920s, states in the Colorado River Basin grew concerned about their shares of water in the river. California was growing rapidly, and some feared it would establish priority access to the water.

Delph Carpenter, an attorney in Colorado, proposed that the states should come together to negotiate river water allocation. The states took 11 months to reach an agreement: the Colorado River Compact. It divided states in the watershed into an Upper Basin and a Lower Basin, which would each receive 7.5 million acre-feet of water per year. From there, the basins were left to figure out how to split up the water among themselves.
In the decades following the compact, subsequent court cases, treaties and agreements hammered out exactly how the water would be distributed. Together, these are called the “Law of the River.”
Who was involved, and who was not?
The compact was signed by delegates from seven states—Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming—as well as a representative from the federal government, Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover. It was the first time so many states had come together to make an agreement—a momentous occasion in U.S. history.
But while Native Americans had been using water in the river for millennia and had legal rights to it, per a 1908 Supreme Court case, they were left out of the agreement, as was Mexico.
All states ratified the compact except for Arizona. Its then-governor said the compact put Arizona at a disadvantage, because it would be forced to compete directly with California for water. Arizona later joined the agreement in the early 1940s, and the two states still face bitter disputes over water today.

One century later, what has changed?
While the Law of the River still governs water use, conditions have shifted drastically in the 100 years since the compact was signed. Hoover predicted the basin’s population, which was about 457,000 in 1915, would quadruple. Today, the river serves 40 million people—more than 20 times his prediction.
And states are now using more water than is sustainable. The 1922 negotiations allocated water use based on data from an unusually wet period in history, Brad Udall, a senior water and climate research scientist at the Colorado Water Institute at Colorado State University, tells Smithsonian magazine. Now, with reduced water in the river and its reservoirs, these allocations are outdated. The signers likely knew their agreement would create a long-term problem, some experts say, but they ignored the research and forged ahead anyway.
“Uses are somewhere on the order of about 15 million acre-feet. The historical flow since 2000 is around 12 million acre-feet,” Udall says. “We’ve got a 3 million acre-foot imbalance.”
Meanwhile, climate change is reducing the mountain snowpack that feeds the river, and it’s also causing more evaporation. Warmer, drier conditions have thrown the entire basin into a 23-year-long drought that is ongoing. But Udall and other scientists argue the word “aridification” is a more accurate term, since the conditions are unlikely to change.
“Since 2000, the basin has been in a state of profound imbalance,” Udall says. “As a result, the Colorado River reservoirs, the nation’s two largest reservoirs, have declined by roughly 70 percent.”
The water shortage has forced the federal government to take drastic action—it has ordered cuts to water usage and reduced downstream releases from the Glen Canyon and Hoover dams, which form Lake Powell and Lake Mead, respectively. But even these measures haven’t been enough.
Native American tribes, which were excluded from the original 20th-century negotiations, have inherent rights to the diminishing water supply—a combined total of about 20 percent of the river’s historical flow. But many tribes are still fighting for these rights to be recognized.
“While people are conserving, we’re trying to develop our water,” Tulley-Cordova says. “A large population of our nation still don’t have running water.”
Jack Schmidt, director of the Center for Colorado River Studies at Utah State University, tells Smithsonian magazine the situation is dire. One more extremely dry winter—on par with the record-breaking dry conditions that occurred in 2002—will either drain Lake Powell or force the government to take unprecedented emergency action, he says.
“We’re in abject crisis right now,” Schmidt says. “We’re on the edge of that cliff. We’re about to fall off.”
What’s next for the basin?
The basin faces an immediate crisis of dry conditions this winter. But it also faces the long-term crisis of overuse, says Schmidt.
“We must, as a nation, reduce our long-term use rates to be consistent with the supply,” he says. “That's just basic checkbook accounting.”
In 2026, several current agreements regarding water usage will expire, forcing new compromises to be made about water allocation. So far, though, no one has decided what those new rules will look like.
“I don’t know where we’re going. I don’t know that anybody would tell you where we’re going. But if we don’t make decisions fast, nature’s going to make them for us,” Udall says. “The real threat here is that we empty these two reservoirs and then become reliant on an annual allocation that nature provides, instead of an annual allocation that we humans decide what’s best for us.”
But Udall says one reason to remain optimistic is that relationships between states and entities in the basin are good. And moving forward, Tulley-Cordova says that continuing to forge these relationships will be key.
“It’s not to say that we all agree on the way things should be done,” she says. “But the best [strategy for] talking about a complicated subject is not assuming what the other person’s priorities, needs, and challenges and opportunities are.”
Still, scientists say action must be taken—and soon. With Lake Mead and Lake Powell at historic lows and the states failing to cut back their water use, it’s only a matter of time before nature forces the states to make uncomfortable decisions.
“It’s going to be a wild ride. That much, I can tell you,” Udall says. “We’re in a deep hole here.”
weekly@StateOfJeffersonRotary.org
![]()
This 12-Year-Old Designed a Water Bottle You Can Eat
After seeing plastic polluting her favorite beaches year after year, Madison Checketts decided it was time to do something about it
By Jacquelyne Germain

For as long as she can remember, Madison Checketts has loved the beach. Yet when frequenting stretches of the coast around Escondido, California, on annual family vacations, she couldn’t help but notice all the plastic water bottles cluttering the sand and ocean.
“The beach is one of my favorite places to go, and seeing it all trashed up with plastic water bottles, I just felt like this needed to change,” Checketts says.
After learning more about plastic pollution and ways to reduce it, she designed what she calls the Eco-Hero. The gelatinous water bottle is actually edible.
The now 12-year-old student from Eagle Mountain, Utah, started working on the project in October 2021 as part of her elementary school’s science fair. After being selected as one of the students from her school to compete in the school district’s science fair, she won first place at a state science fair before advancing to a national competition. In September, Checketts was named one of the 30 finalists in the 2022 Broadcom Masters Competition, the country’s premier science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) competition for middle school students. There, she was surrounded by other young inventors who designed projects like a remote-controlled robotic hand that could be used in natural disaster situations and a foot-controlled welcome mat that can wirelessly unlock a door to help those with arthritis and other hand conditions.
In her early research, when Checketts asked herself what she could do to make the world a better place, she immediately thought about reducing plastic pollution. Plastic products like water bottles are designed as single-use items intended to be thrown out after use. Americans consume more than 30 billion plastic water bottles annually, with the vast majority not being recycled. After being tossed away, plastic water bottles often end up in the ocean, where more than 5.25 trillion pieces of plastic trash circulate.
Plastic pollution devastates marine environments and poses a specific threat to marine wildlife. Animals like turtles—Checketts’ favorite—may confuse plastic waste for prey and swallow it, which can block their stomachs, make them sick and cause other internal damage. Depending on environmental conditions and chemical properties, plastics can also leach toxic chemicals and contaminants into the ocean.

Checketts stumbled upon a website focused on reverse spherification—a method of enclosing a liquid in a gel membrane—and wondered if she could make an edible water bottle using this process. Reverse spherification was popularized by a team of chefs, creatives and researchers from the Spanish restaurant El Bulli in 2005. The process stems from another culinary technique pioneered in the 1940s called spherification—used to create culinary delights like the “popping boba” in bubble tea drinks—in which a liquid is turned into a semi-solid sphere. Compared to basic spherification, reverse spherification allows for the liquid encased in the membrane to remain a liquid for longer. The sphere itself can be bigger, too.
Checketts’ approach was based on further internet research about reverse spherification methods. She relied on a chemical reaction between two common food additives—a salt called calcium lactate and a natural polymer found in brown algae called sodium alginate. When mixed together, the chemicals form a cross link resulting in a gel membrane that traps liquid.
After some trial and error, Checketts made her final prototype by mixing calcium lactate, xanthan gum (another common food additive and thickening agent), lemon juice and water in a blender. She froze the calcium lactate solution in a rectangular mold and then placed the frozen rectangle in a sodium alginate solution, rotating it until a membrane began to form. Once the membrane was fully formed, after about seven minutes, Checketts removed the oval-shaped membrane from the sodium alginate solution and placed it in a bath of distilled water to stop the membrane from continuing to form. When she let the edible water bottle sit in the fridge submerged in a mixture of lemon juice and water, it lasted about three weeks before the membrane burst.
The Eco-Hero holds about three-quarters of a cup of water and costs about $1.20 to make. Basically, the consumer bites a hole at the top of the gelatinous membrane, drinks the water and then either eats the membrane or throws it away. In addition to being edible, the Eco-Hero is also biodegradable. Checketts says the drink tastes like water with a hint of lemon, and the edible membrane has the texture of a gummy bear and tastes slightly lemony but comes to have no taste as it’s chewed.

“It took a lot of tries to get the membrane strong enough so it wouldn’t pop in my hands,” Checketts says. “A lot of times when I tried to pick it up, it would just fall apart, and that was one of the biggest issues.”
She tested various concentrations of the calcium lactate, sodium alginate and xanthan gum to achieve the best results. Adding xanthan gum to the calcium lactate solution helped make the membrane stronger, but she says the outer layer and water tasted soapy. To overcome this problem, she added a teaspoon of lemon juice to the calcium lactate solution to improve the taste and make it last longer. The idea to add lemon juice to the water solution and use it as a preservative for the water bottle stemmed from her fifth-grade school science fair project, which focused on keeping strawberries from molding by coating them in lemon juice.
“She learned that hard work pays off, and I saw that with her as she went through the process and she got frustrated at times,” says Checketts’ mother, Missy Checketts. “I didn’t really have to do anything, just watch her try and try and try. The biggest thing I saw that she did was just to keep trying new things, and if it didn’t work, she would research something else and then try it again.”
Checketts isn’t the first to design an edible water bottle, and some of her predecessors influenced her work. One such product is the edible Ooho water bottle developed in 2014 by former Imperial College London design students Rodrigo García González, Pierre Paslier and Guillaume Couche. Ooho’s designers used a similar reverse spherification method to Checketts, but they instead opted to use calcium chloride as opposed to calcium lactate, and they did not use lemon juice or xanthan gum. Checketts was inspired by their work, but she wanted to make an edible water bottle that was bigger and more durable. The Ooho water bottles hold about 50 milliliters of water, whereas the Eco-Hero holds four times that at about 200 milliliters.
Daniel Rittschof, an environmental scientist at Duke University, says he has worked with the reverse spherification technology Checketts used in her project and believes her idea is a good one. “This is the kind of innovation that people need to do, and they need to figure out how to move forward,” Rittschof says. “[Checketts] is on the right path, because she wants to make a difference, and she’s learning chemistry and biology and a little bit of business.”
On a practical level, however, Rittschof questions if the design of the edible bottle would work, adding that it’s important to consider how safe it is to actually eat the container, what trace amounts of different chemicals are in the bottle, how the product would be transported from one place to another without rupturing and more. “From my perspective, this is an idea that if you actually look at it practically, the basic idea probably wouldn’t work, but that doesn’t mean you couldn’t pursue the idea until it could work,” he says. Several secondary issues would need to be addressed before the product could be sold or used on a large scale, Rittschof adds, but the concept of being able to eat the water bottle is a “really good idea.”

In her free time, Checketts likes to play soccer, craft jewelry, draw and spend time with family and friends. Now a seventh grader, she hopes to excel in her classes and to begin to think about taking more advanced courses next school year. When she grows up, she wants to find a way to combine her hobbies and studies, and either be an engineer, designer or soccer player.
As Checketts thinks about the future of the Eco-Hero, she says she wants to run more tests to improve the water bottle and make it resealable, stronger and bigger. She imagines her invention could be used during marathons or races—as runners stop for water, they’d be able to grab an Eco-Hero, drink the water and either eat or dispose of the membrane before continuing to run. Overall, she hopes the Eco-Hero encourages people to think sustainably and understand that everyone can make the world a better place.
“It doesn’t necessarily have to be in a big way,” says Checketts. “[People] can still make a difference in the world, even if it’s just in a small way.”


You are not authorised to post comments.